Predictors of outcome in patients with myasthenic crisis undergoing non-invasive mechanical ventilation: A retrospective 20 year longitudinal cohort study from a single Italian center.

About 20% of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) may develop myasthenic crisis (MC) requiring ventilation, either invasive (MV) or non-invasive (NIV) and intensive unit care (ICU). NIV failure in patients with MC can occur up to 60% of cases admitted to ICU. Moreover it is not known the outcome of MC receiving NIV. Purpose of this study was to identify predictors of outcome in MC who underwent non-invasive ventilator support outside ICU setting. We enrolled 90 patients, 53 females and 37 males admitted to University Hospital of Modena (Italy) between January 2000 and September 2020. Median age at MC was 65 years. Thirty-four patients (37.8%) required MV. Thymectomy was performed in 45 cases, associated with thymoma in 55%, with hyperplastic thymus in 33%. First-line treatment was plasmaexchange (38.8%) or intravenous immunoglobulins (45.6%). Males exhibited higher risk of MV than females .Patients in MV were treated with plasmaexchange as first-line therapy . Our in-hospital mortality rate was low. Nine patients underwent tracheostomy which was significantly related to male gender. Comorbidities had significant effect on length of ICU .Our study confirms as predictors of prognosis in our patients male gender, older age at onset, infections as trigger, pneumonia.

Estimating the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on services provided by Italian Neuromuscular Centers: an Italian Association of Myology survey of the acute phase.

INTRODUCTION: Since February 2020, the outbreak of COVID-19 in Italy has forced the health care system to undergo profound rearrangements in its services and facilities, especially in the worst-hit areas in Northern Italy. In this setting, inpatient and outpatient services had to rethink and reorganize their activities to meet the needs of patients during the "lockdown". The Italian Association of Myology developed a survey to estimate the impact of these changes on patients affected by neuromuscular disorders and on specialized neuromuscular centers during the acute phase of COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We developed an electronic survey that was sent to neuromuscular centers affiliated with the Italian Association of Myology, assessing changes in pharmacological therapies provision, outpatient clinical and instrumental services, support services (physiotherapy, nursing care, psychological support) and clinical trials. RESULTS: 40% of surveyed neuromuscular centers reported a reduction in outpatient visit and examinations (44.5% of centers in Northern regions; 25% of centers in Central regions; 50% of centers in Southern regions). Twenty-two% of centers postponed in-hospital administration of therapies for neuromuscular diseases (23.4% in Northern regions; 13.0% in Central regions; 20% in Southern regions). Diagnostic and support services (physiotherapy, nursing care, psychological support) were suspended in 57% of centers (66/43/44% in Northern, Central and Southern centers respectively) Overall, the most affected services were rehabilitative services and on-site outpatient visits, which were suspended in 93% of centers. Strategies adopted by neuromuscular centers to overcome these changes included maintaining urgent on-site visits, addressing patients to available services and promoting remote contact and telemedicine. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a significant disruption of clinical and support services for patients with neuromuscular diseases. Despite the efforts to provide telemedicine consults to patients, this option could be promoted and improved further. A close collaboration between the different neuromuscular centers and service providers as well as further implementation of telehealth platforms are necessary to ensure quality care to NMD patients in the near future and in case of recurrent pandemic waves.